2) Looks like Justice Blackman's standard of "viability" from Roe is the only one that still makes sense as to the outer limit of when non- judicially involved --if Judges are ever required at all as to women's medical care -- abortions take place. If a "heart beat";is not even present until 9 weeks and even if a heartbeat is "there" then the "mass of protoplasm in an almost shrimp-like shape" cannot live on its own at that stage. How the H is a six week ban ever making sense / is rational?The "blob" is not a "child" in any biological sense;
3) If I were at least a tort lawyer in practicing in any state -- I practice in FL in other areas of the law-- I'd recommend to a client to go after ANY "crisis pregnancy" clinic for at the very least "unfair and deceptive trade practices, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and even to see if the clinic has violated criminal laws, such as "scams" and "fraud" and whatever goes with the facts. Further, if the woman was arrested and charged with any crimes, I'd point out to the State Attorney and Judge and media the interference by the clinic that was part of the causes for the woman to miss any abortion deadlines. Perhaps charges can be downgraded and/ or perhaps the clinic circumstances could be used to mitigate any sentence, and for plea negotiation purposes.
4) Everything in my post are just my first thoughts, but here's the final one for right now: I'd file a complaint with the State's judicial qualifications board and state's bar against any judge that applied a standard based upon his or her religious beliefs as a violation of his / her oath and state and federal constitutions and/ or any applicable states, rules, Bar ethics rules, etc. I'd ask for the Judge to recuse himself and for a new trial, new impartial judge or appellate panel and appeal.
1) Please keep reporting!
2) Looks like Justice Blackman's standard of "viability" from Roe is the only one that still makes sense as to the outer limit of when non- judicially involved --if Judges are ever required at all as to women's medical care -- abortions take place. If a "heart beat";is not even present until 9 weeks and even if a heartbeat is "there" then the "mass of protoplasm in an almost shrimp-like shape" cannot live on its own at that stage. How the H is a six week ban ever making sense / is rational?The "blob" is not a "child" in any biological sense;
3) If I were at least a tort lawyer in practicing in any state -- I practice in FL in other areas of the law-- I'd recommend to a client to go after ANY "crisis pregnancy" clinic for at the very least "unfair and deceptive trade practices, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and even to see if the clinic has violated criminal laws, such as "scams" and "fraud" and whatever goes with the facts. Further, if the woman was arrested and charged with any crimes, I'd point out to the State Attorney and Judge and media the interference by the clinic that was part of the causes for the woman to miss any abortion deadlines. Perhaps charges can be downgraded and/ or perhaps the clinic circumstances could be used to mitigate any sentence, and for plea negotiation purposes.
4) Everything in my post are just my first thoughts, but here's the final one for right now: I'd file a complaint with the State's judicial qualifications board and state's bar against any judge that applied a standard based upon his or her religious beliefs as a violation of his / her oath and state and federal constitutions and/ or any applicable states, rules, Bar ethics rules, etc. I'd ask for the Judge to recuse himself and for a new trial, new impartial judge or appellate panel and appeal.
Yes, totally agree, especially about the crisis pregnancy centers!!